Aptamer/Graphene Oxide Nanocomplex for in Situ Molecular Probing in Living Cells
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja103169v →Countries where authors are citing Aptamer/Graphene Oxide Nanocomplex for in Situ Molecular Probing in Living Cells
This map shows the geographic impact of Aptamer/Graphene Oxide Nanocomplex for in Situ Molecular Probing in Living Cells. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aptamer/Graphene Oxide Nanocomplex for in Situ Molecular Probing in Living Cells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aptamer/Graphene Oxide Nanocomplex for in Situ Molecular Probing in Living Cells more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Aptamer/Graphene Oxide Nanocomplex for in Situ Molecular Probing in Living Cells
This network shows the impact of Aptamer/Graphene Oxide Nanocomplex for in Situ Molecular Probing in Living Cells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Aptamer/Graphene Oxide Nanocomplex for in Situ Molecular Probing in Living Cells.
About Aptamer/Graphene Oxide Nanocomplex for in Situ Molecular Probing in Living Cells
This paper, published in 2010, received 942 indexed citations . Written by Ying Wang, Zhaohui Li, Dehong Hu, Chiann-Tso Lin, Jinghong Li and Yuehe Lin covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (592 citations), Biomedical Engineering (569 citations) and Materials Chemistry (512 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja103169v.