CdS Quantum Dots Sensitized TiO2 Nanotube-Array Photoelectrodes
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja0777741 →Countries where authors are citing CdS Quantum Dots Sensitized TiO2 Nanotube-Array Photoelectrodes
This map shows the geographic impact of CdS Quantum Dots Sensitized TiO2 Nanotube-Array Photoelectrodes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by CdS Quantum Dots Sensitized TiO2 Nanotube-Array Photoelectrodes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CdS Quantum Dots Sensitized TiO2 Nanotube-Array Photoelectrodes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing CdS Quantum Dots Sensitized TiO2 Nanotube-Array Photoelectrodes
This network shows the impact of CdS Quantum Dots Sensitized TiO2 Nanotube-Array Photoelectrodes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the CdS Quantum Dots Sensitized TiO2 Nanotube-Array Photoelectrodes.
About CdS Quantum Dots Sensitized TiO2 Nanotube-Array Photoelectrodes
This paper, published in 2008, received 985 indexed citations . Written by Wentao Sun, Yuan Yu, Huayong Pan, Xianfeng Gao, Qing Chen and Lian‐Mao Peng covering the research area of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (827 citations), Materials Chemistry (805 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (281 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja0777741.