Nano-Flares:  Probes for Transfection and mRNA Detection in Living Cells

612 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2007, received 612 indexed citations. Written by Dwight S. Seferos, David A. Giljohann, Haley D. Hill, Andrew E. Prigodich and Chad A. Mirkin covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (545 citations), Biomedical Engineering (215 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (144 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Countries where authors are citing Nano-Flares:  Probes for Transfection and mRNA Detection in Living Cells

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nano-Flares:  Probes for Transfection and mRNA Detection in Living Cells. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nano-Flares:  Probes for Transfection and mRNA Detection in Living Cells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nano-Flares:  Probes for Transfection and mRNA Detection in Living Cells more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Nano-Flares:  Probes for Transfection and mRNA Detection in Living Cells

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Nano-Flares:  Probes for Transfection and mRNA Detection in Living Cells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nano-Flares:  Probes for Transfection and mRNA Detection in Living Cells.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja0776529.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026