Compact Biocompatible Quantum Dots Functionalized for Cellular Imaging
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja076069p →Countries where authors are citing Compact Biocompatible Quantum Dots Functionalized for Cellular Imaging
This map shows the geographic impact of Compact Biocompatible Quantum Dots Functionalized for Cellular Imaging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Compact Biocompatible Quantum Dots Functionalized for Cellular Imaging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Compact Biocompatible Quantum Dots Functionalized for Cellular Imaging more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Compact Biocompatible Quantum Dots Functionalized for Cellular Imaging
This network shows the impact of Compact Biocompatible Quantum Dots Functionalized for Cellular Imaging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Compact Biocompatible Quantum Dots Functionalized for Cellular Imaging.
About Compact Biocompatible Quantum Dots Functionalized for Cellular Imaging
This paper, published in 2008, received 530 indexed citations . Written by Wenhao Liu, Mark Howarth, Andrew B. Greytak, Yi Zheng, Daniel G. Nocera, Alice Y. Ting and Moungi G. Bawendi covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (417 citations), Molecular Biology (282 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (121 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja076069p.