Reticular Synthesis of Microporous and Mesoporous 2D Covalent Organic Frameworks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja0751781 →Countries where authors are citing Reticular Synthesis of Microporous and Mesoporous 2D Covalent Organic Frameworks
This map shows the geographic impact of Reticular Synthesis of Microporous and Mesoporous 2D Covalent Organic Frameworks. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reticular Synthesis of Microporous and Mesoporous 2D Covalent Organic Frameworks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reticular Synthesis of Microporous and Mesoporous 2D Covalent Organic Frameworks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Reticular Synthesis of Microporous and Mesoporous 2D Covalent Organic Frameworks
This network shows the impact of Reticular Synthesis of Microporous and Mesoporous 2D Covalent Organic Frameworks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reticular Synthesis of Microporous and Mesoporous 2D Covalent Organic Frameworks.
About Reticular Synthesis of Microporous and Mesoporous 2D Covalent Organic Frameworks
This paper, published in 2007, received 710 indexed citations . Written by Adrien P. Côté, Hani M. El‐Kaderi, Hiroyasu Furukawa, Joseph R. Hunt and Omar M. Yaghi covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Mechanical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (667 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (571 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (162 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja0751781.