Nanosize Effect on High-Rate Li-Ion Intercalation in LiCoO2 Electrode
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja0681927 →Countries where authors are citing Nanosize Effect on High-Rate Li-Ion Intercalation in LiCoO2 Electrode
This map shows the geographic impact of Nanosize Effect on High-Rate Li-Ion Intercalation in LiCoO2 Electrode. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nanosize Effect on High-Rate Li-Ion Intercalation in LiCoO2 Electrode with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanosize Effect on High-Rate Li-Ion Intercalation in LiCoO2 Electrode more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Nanosize Effect on High-Rate Li-Ion Intercalation in LiCoO2 Electrode
This network shows the impact of Nanosize Effect on High-Rate Li-Ion Intercalation in LiCoO2 Electrode. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nanosize Effect on High-Rate Li-Ion Intercalation in LiCoO2 Electrode.
About Nanosize Effect on High-Rate Li-Ion Intercalation in LiCoO2 Electrode
This paper, published in 2007, received 690 indexed citations . Written by Masashi Okubo, Eiji Hosono, Je‐Deok Kim, Masaya Enomoto, Norimichi Kojima, Tetsuichi Kudo, Haoshen Zhou and Itaru Honma covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (641 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (326 citations) and Automotive Engineering (144 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja0681927.