Large Impact of Particle Size on Insertion Reactions. A Case for Anatase LixTiO2
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja067733p →Countries where authors are citing Large Impact of Particle Size on Insertion Reactions. A Case for Anatase LixTiO2
This map shows the geographic impact of Large Impact of Particle Size on Insertion Reactions. A Case for Anatase LixTiO2. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Large Impact of Particle Size on Insertion Reactions. A Case for Anatase LixTiO2 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Large Impact of Particle Size on Insertion Reactions. A Case for Anatase LixTiO2 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Large Impact of Particle Size on Insertion Reactions. A Case for Anatase LixTiO2
This network shows the impact of Large Impact of Particle Size on Insertion Reactions. A Case for Anatase LixTiO2. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Large Impact of Particle Size on Insertion Reactions. A Case for Anatase LixTiO2.
About Large Impact of Particle Size on Insertion Reactions. A Case for Anatase LixTiO2
This paper, published in 2007, received 663 indexed citations . Written by Marnix Wagemaker, Wouter J. H. Borghols and Fokko M. Mulder covering the research area of Automotive Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (599 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (240 citations) and Materials Chemistry (135 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja067733p.