Quantum-Sized Carbon Dots for Bright and Colorful Photoluminescence
- Authors
- Ya‐Ping SunBing ZhouYi LinWei WangK. A. Shiral Fernando
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja062677d →Countries where authors are citing Quantum-Sized Carbon Dots for Bright and Colorful Photoluminescence
This map shows the geographic impact of Quantum-Sized Carbon Dots for Bright and Colorful Photoluminescence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Quantum-Sized Carbon Dots for Bright and Colorful Photoluminescence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quantum-Sized Carbon Dots for Bright and Colorful Photoluminescence more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Quantum-Sized Carbon Dots for Bright and Colorful Photoluminescence
This network shows the impact of Quantum-Sized Carbon Dots for Bright and Colorful Photoluminescence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Quantum-Sized Carbon Dots for Bright and Colorful Photoluminescence.
About Quantum-Sized Carbon Dots for Bright and Colorful Photoluminescence
This paper, published in 2006, received 4.2k indexed citations . Written by Ya‐Ping Sun, Bing Zhou, Yi Lin, Wei Wang, K. A. Shiral Fernando, Pankaj Pathak, Mohammed J. Meziani, Barbara A. Harruff, Xin Wang and Haifang Wang covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (4.0k citations), Biomedical Engineering (798 citations) and Molecular Biology (730 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja062677d.