pH-Sensitive Vesicles Based on a Biocompatible Zwitterionic Diblock Copolymer
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja056514l →Countries where authors are citing pH-Sensitive Vesicles Based on a Biocompatible Zwitterionic Diblock Copolymer
This map shows the geographic impact of pH-Sensitive Vesicles Based on a Biocompatible Zwitterionic Diblock Copolymer. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by pH-Sensitive Vesicles Based on a Biocompatible Zwitterionic Diblock Copolymer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites pH-Sensitive Vesicles Based on a Biocompatible Zwitterionic Diblock Copolymer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing pH-Sensitive Vesicles Based on a Biocompatible Zwitterionic Diblock Copolymer
This network shows the impact of pH-Sensitive Vesicles Based on a Biocompatible Zwitterionic Diblock Copolymer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the pH-Sensitive Vesicles Based on a Biocompatible Zwitterionic Diblock Copolymer.
About pH-Sensitive Vesicles Based on a Biocompatible Zwitterionic Diblock Copolymer
This paper, published in 2005, received 536 indexed citations . Written by Jianzhong Du, Yiqing Tang, Andrew L. Lewis and Steven P. Armes covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Surfaces, Coatings and Films and Inorganic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (343 citations), Biomaterials (223 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (186 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja056514l.