Ruthenium-Catalyzed Cycloaddition of Alkynes and Organic Azides

925 indexed citations
published 2005

Countries where authors are citing Ruthenium-Catalyzed Cycloaddition of Alkynes and Organic Azides

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruthenium-Catalyzed Cycloaddition of Alkynes and Organic Azides. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruthenium-Catalyzed Cycloaddition of Alkynes and Organic Azides with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruthenium-Catalyzed Cycloaddition of Alkynes and Organic Azides more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Ruthenium-Catalyzed Cycloaddition of Alkynes and Organic Azides

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Ruthenium-Catalyzed Cycloaddition of Alkynes and Organic Azides. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ruthenium-Catalyzed Cycloaddition of Alkynes and Organic Azides.

About Ruthenium-Catalyzed Cycloaddition of Alkynes and Organic Azides

This paper, published in 2005, received 925 indexed citations . Written by Li Zhang, Xinguo Chen, Peng Xue, Ian D. Williams, K. Barry Sharpless, Valery V. Fokin and Guochen Jia covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (880 citations), Molecular Biology (503 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (81 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja054114s.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026