Reagentless, Reusable, Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Molecular Beacon Aptasensor
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja053121d →Countries where authors are citing Reagentless, Reusable, Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Molecular Beacon Aptasensor
This map shows the geographic impact of Reagentless, Reusable, Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Molecular Beacon Aptasensor. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reagentless, Reusable, Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Molecular Beacon Aptasensor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reagentless, Reusable, Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Molecular Beacon Aptasensor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Reagentless, Reusable, Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Molecular Beacon Aptasensor
This network shows the impact of Reagentless, Reusable, Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Molecular Beacon Aptasensor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reagentless, Reusable, Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Molecular Beacon Aptasensor.
About Reagentless, Reusable, Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Molecular Beacon Aptasensor
This paper, published in 2005, received 536 indexed citations . Written by Abd‐Elgawad Radi, Josep Lluís Acero Sánchez, Eva Baldrich and Ciara K. O’Sullivan covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Electrochemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (504 citations), Biomedical Engineering (226 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (205 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja053121d.