Selective Detection of Cysteine and Glutathione Using Gold Nanorods
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja051145e →Countries where authors are citing Selective Detection of Cysteine and Glutathione Using Gold Nanorods
This map shows the geographic impact of Selective Detection of Cysteine and Glutathione Using Gold Nanorods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Selective Detection of Cysteine and Glutathione Using Gold Nanorods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Selective Detection of Cysteine and Glutathione Using Gold Nanorods more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Selective Detection of Cysteine and Glutathione Using Gold Nanorods
This network shows the impact of Selective Detection of Cysteine and Glutathione Using Gold Nanorods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Selective Detection of Cysteine and Glutathione Using Gold Nanorods.
About Selective Detection of Cysteine and Glutathione Using Gold Nanorods
This paper, published in 2005, received 548 indexed citations . Written by P. K. Sudeep, Saju Joseph and K. George Thomas covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (331 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (250 citations) and Molecular Biology (246 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja051145e.