Hydrogen Sorption in Functionalized Metal−Organic Frameworks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja049408c →Countries where authors are citing Hydrogen Sorption in Functionalized Metal−Organic Frameworks
This map shows the geographic impact of Hydrogen Sorption in Functionalized Metal−Organic Frameworks. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hydrogen Sorption in Functionalized Metal−Organic Frameworks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hydrogen Sorption in Functionalized Metal−Organic Frameworks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Hydrogen Sorption in Functionalized Metal−Organic Frameworks
This network shows the impact of Hydrogen Sorption in Functionalized Metal−Organic Frameworks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Hydrogen Sorption in Functionalized Metal−Organic Frameworks.
About Hydrogen Sorption in Functionalized Metal−Organic Frameworks
This paper, published in 2004, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Jesse L. C. Rowsell, Andrew R. Millward, Kyo Sung Park and Omar M. Yaghi covering the research area of Inorganic Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Inorganic Chemistry (1.0k citations), Materials Chemistry (797 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (328 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja049408c.