In Vitro Demonstration of the Heavy-Atom Effect for Photodynamic Therapy

809 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2004, received 809 indexed citations. Written by J. Killoran, Tony Kenna, William M. Gallagher and Donal F. O’Shea covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (696 citations), Biomedical Engineering (406 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (217 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Countries where authors are citing In Vitro Demonstration of the Heavy-Atom Effect for Photodynamic Therapy

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of In Vitro Demonstration of the Heavy-Atom Effect for Photodynamic Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by In Vitro Demonstration of the Heavy-Atom Effect for Photodynamic Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites In Vitro Demonstration of the Heavy-Atom Effect for Photodynamic Therapy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing In Vitro Demonstration of the Heavy-Atom Effect for Photodynamic Therapy

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of In Vitro Demonstration of the Heavy-Atom Effect for Photodynamic Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the In Vitro Demonstration of the Heavy-Atom Effect for Photodynamic Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja047649e.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026