Evolution of Fluorescein as a Platform for Finely Tunable Fluorescence Probes
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja043919h →Countries where authors are citing Evolution of Fluorescein as a Platform for Finely Tunable Fluorescence Probes
This map shows the geographic impact of Evolution of Fluorescein as a Platform for Finely Tunable Fluorescence Probes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evolution of Fluorescein as a Platform for Finely Tunable Fluorescence Probes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evolution of Fluorescein as a Platform for Finely Tunable Fluorescence Probes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Evolution of Fluorescein as a Platform for Finely Tunable Fluorescence Probes
This network shows the impact of Evolution of Fluorescein as a Platform for Finely Tunable Fluorescence Probes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Evolution of Fluorescein as a Platform for Finely Tunable Fluorescence Probes.
About Evolution of Fluorescein as a Platform for Finely Tunable Fluorescence Probes
This paper, published in 2005, received 601 indexed citations . Written by Yasuteru Urano, Mako Kamiya, Tasuku Ueno, Kenzo Hirose and Tetsuo Nagano covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Spectroscopy (259 citations), Materials Chemistry (255 citations) and Molecular Biology (211 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja043919h.