A Highly Active Zinc Catalyst for the Controlled Polymerization of Lactide
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja0359512 →Countries where authors are citing A Highly Active Zinc Catalyst for the Controlled Polymerization of Lactide
This map shows the geographic impact of A Highly Active Zinc Catalyst for the Controlled Polymerization of Lactide. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Highly Active Zinc Catalyst for the Controlled Polymerization of Lactide with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Highly Active Zinc Catalyst for the Controlled Polymerization of Lactide more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Highly Active Zinc Catalyst for the Controlled Polymerization of Lactide
This network shows the impact of A Highly Active Zinc Catalyst for the Controlled Polymerization of Lactide. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Highly Active Zinc Catalyst for the Controlled Polymerization of Lactide.
About A Highly Active Zinc Catalyst for the Controlled Polymerization of Lactide
This paper, published in 2003, received 544 indexed citations . Written by Charlotte K. Williams, Sun Kyung Choi, Wonwoo Nam, Victor G. Young, Marc A. Hillmyer and William B. Tolman covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Process Chemistry and Technology and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomaterials (480 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (452 citations) and Organic Chemistry (364 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja0359512.