Protein Electrochemistry Using Aligned Carbon Nanotube Arrays
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja035722f →Countries where authors are citing Protein Electrochemistry Using Aligned Carbon Nanotube Arrays
This map shows the geographic impact of Protein Electrochemistry Using Aligned Carbon Nanotube Arrays. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Protein Electrochemistry Using Aligned Carbon Nanotube Arrays with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Protein Electrochemistry Using Aligned Carbon Nanotube Arrays more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Protein Electrochemistry Using Aligned Carbon Nanotube Arrays
This network shows the impact of Protein Electrochemistry Using Aligned Carbon Nanotube Arrays. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Protein Electrochemistry Using Aligned Carbon Nanotube Arrays.
About Protein Electrochemistry Using Aligned Carbon Nanotube Arrays
This paper, published in 2003, received 695 indexed citations . Written by J. Justin Gooding, Rahmat Wibowo, Liu, Wenrong Yang, Dušan Lošić, Joseph G. Shapter and David Brynn Hibbert covering the research area of Electrochemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (573 citations), Electrochemistry (393 citations) and Molecular Biology (203 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja035722f.