Toward a Glucose Biosensor Based on Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering
Countries where authors are citing Toward a Glucose Biosensor Based on Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering
This map shows the geographic impact of Toward a Glucose Biosensor Based on Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Toward a Glucose Biosensor Based on Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toward a Glucose Biosensor Based on Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Toward a Glucose Biosensor Based on Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering
This network shows the impact of Toward a Glucose Biosensor Based on Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Toward a Glucose Biosensor Based on Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering.
About Toward a Glucose Biosensor Based on Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering
This paper, published in 2002, received 553 indexed citations . Written by Karen Shafer‐Peltier, Christy L. Haynes, Matthew R. Glucksberg and Richard P. Van Duyne covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Biophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (357 citations), Biomedical Engineering (261 citations) and Molecular Biology (222 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja028255v.