Estimates of the Ab Initio Limit for π−π Interactions:  The Benzene Dimer

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 1.2k indexed citations. Written by Mutasem Omar Sinnokrot, Edward F. Valeev and C. David Sherrill covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (410 citations), Organic Chemistry (409 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (380 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Countries where authors are citing Estimates of the Ab Initio Limit for π−π Interactions:  The Benzene Dimer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Estimates of the Ab Initio Limit for π−π Interactions:  The Benzene Dimer. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Estimates of the Ab Initio Limit for π−π Interactions:  The Benzene Dimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Estimates of the Ab Initio Limit for π−π Interactions:  The Benzene Dimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Estimates of the Ab Initio Limit for π−π Interactions:  The Benzene Dimer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Estimates of the Ab Initio Limit for π−π Interactions:  The Benzene Dimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Estimates of the Ab Initio Limit for π−π Interactions:  The Benzene Dimer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja025896h.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026