Self-Assembled Nanoparticle Probes for Recognition and Detection of Biomolecules

734 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2002, received 734 indexed citations. Written by Dustin J. Maxwell, Jason R. Taylor and Shuming Nie covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (502 citations), Materials Chemistry (303 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (284 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Countries where authors are citing Self-Assembled Nanoparticle Probes for Recognition and Detection of Biomolecules

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Self-Assembled Nanoparticle Probes for Recognition and Detection of Biomolecules. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Self-Assembled Nanoparticle Probes for Recognition and Detection of Biomolecules with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Self-Assembled Nanoparticle Probes for Recognition and Detection of Biomolecules more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Self-Assembled Nanoparticle Probes for Recognition and Detection of Biomolecules

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Self-Assembled Nanoparticle Probes for Recognition and Detection of Biomolecules. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Self-Assembled Nanoparticle Probes for Recognition and Detection of Biomolecules.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja025814p.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026