Bioconjugation by Copper(I)-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne [3 + 2] Cycloaddition
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja021381e →Countries where authors are citing Bioconjugation by Copper(I)-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne [3 + 2] Cycloaddition
This map shows the geographic impact of Bioconjugation by Copper(I)-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne [3 + 2] Cycloaddition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bioconjugation by Copper(I)-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne [3 + 2] Cycloaddition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bioconjugation by Copper(I)-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne [3 + 2] Cycloaddition more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Bioconjugation by Copper(I)-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne [3 + 2] Cycloaddition
This network shows the impact of Bioconjugation by Copper(I)-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne [3 + 2] Cycloaddition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Bioconjugation by Copper(I)-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne [3 + 2] Cycloaddition.
About Bioconjugation by Copper(I)-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne [3 + 2] Cycloaddition
This paper, published in 2003, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Qian Wang, Timothy R. Chan, Robert Hilgraf, Valery V. Fokin, K. Barry Sharpless and M. G. Finn covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Oncology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (1.0k citations), Molecular Biology (901 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (316 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja021381e.