Anion−Aromatic Bonding:  A Case for Anion Recognition by π-Acidic Rings

590 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2002, received 590 indexed citations. Written by Mark Mascal, Alan Armstrong and Michael D. Bartberger covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (366 citations), Spectroscopy (345 citations) and Organic Chemistry (221 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Countries where authors are citing Anion−Aromatic Bonding:  A Case for Anion Recognition by π-Acidic Rings

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anion−Aromatic Bonding:  A Case for Anion Recognition by π-Acidic Rings. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anion−Aromatic Bonding:  A Case for Anion Recognition by π-Acidic Rings with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anion−Aromatic Bonding:  A Case for Anion Recognition by π-Acidic Rings more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Anion−Aromatic Bonding:  A Case for Anion Recognition by π-Acidic Rings

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Anion−Aromatic Bonding:  A Case for Anion Recognition by π-Acidic Rings. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Anion−Aromatic Bonding:  A Case for Anion Recognition by π-Acidic Rings.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja017449s.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026