Stretching Frequencies as a Function of Distances in Hydrogen Bonds

831 indexed citations
published 1955

Countries where authors are citing Stretching Frequencies as a Function of Distances in Hydrogen Bonds

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stretching Frequencies as a Function of Distances in Hydrogen Bonds. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stretching Frequencies as a Function of Distances in Hydrogen Bonds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stretching Frequencies as a Function of Distances in Hydrogen Bonds more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Stretching Frequencies as a Function of Distances in Hydrogen Bonds

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Stretching Frequencies as a Function of Distances in Hydrogen Bonds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Stretching Frequencies as a Function of Distances in Hydrogen Bonds.

About Stretching Frequencies as a Function of Distances in Hydrogen Bonds

This paper, published in 1955, received 831 indexed citations . Written by Kazuo Nakamoto, Marvin Margoshes and R. E. Rundle covering the research area of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (291 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (179 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (167 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja01629a013.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026