Theory of Protein Titration Curves. I. General Equations for Impenetrable Spheres
- Authors
- Charles TanfordJohn G. Kirkwood
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja01577a001 →Countries where authors are citing Theory of Protein Titration Curves. I. General Equations for Impenetrable Spheres
This map shows the geographic impact of Theory of Protein Titration Curves. I. General Equations for Impenetrable Spheres. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theory of Protein Titration Curves. I. General Equations for Impenetrable Spheres with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theory of Protein Titration Curves. I. General Equations for Impenetrable Spheres more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Theory of Protein Titration Curves. I. General Equations for Impenetrable Spheres
This network shows the impact of Theory of Protein Titration Curves. I. General Equations for Impenetrable Spheres. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Theory of Protein Titration Curves. I. General Equations for Impenetrable Spheres.
About Theory of Protein Titration Curves. I. General Equations for Impenetrable Spheres
This paper, published in 1957, received 658 indexed citations . Written by Charles Tanford and John G. Kirkwood covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (486 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (200 citations) and Materials Chemistry (172 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja01577a001.