Molecular-Based Electronically Switchable Tunnel Junction Devices
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja0114456 →Countries where authors are citing Molecular-Based Electronically Switchable Tunnel Junction Devices
This map shows the geographic impact of Molecular-Based Electronically Switchable Tunnel Junction Devices. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Molecular-Based Electronically Switchable Tunnel Junction Devices with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular-Based Electronically Switchable Tunnel Junction Devices more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Molecular-Based Electronically Switchable Tunnel Junction Devices
This network shows the impact of Molecular-Based Electronically Switchable Tunnel Junction Devices. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Molecular-Based Electronically Switchable Tunnel Junction Devices.
About Molecular-Based Electronically Switchable Tunnel Junction Devices
This paper, published in 2001, received 239 indexed citations . Written by C. Patrick Collier, Jan O. Jeppesen, Yi Luo, Julie Perkins, Eric W. M. Wong, James R. Heath and J. Fraser Stoddart covering the research area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (122 citations), Organic Chemistry (117 citations) and Materials Chemistry (94 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja0114456.