Theory of the measurement of weak molecular complexes. I. General considerations
- Authors
- David A. Deranleau
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja01043a004 →Countries where authors are citing Theory of the measurement of weak molecular complexes. I. General considerations
This map shows the geographic impact of Theory of the measurement of weak molecular complexes. I. General considerations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theory of the measurement of weak molecular complexes. I. General considerations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theory of the measurement of weak molecular complexes. I. General considerations more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Theory of the measurement of weak molecular complexes. I. General considerations
This network shows the impact of Theory of the measurement of weak molecular complexes. I. General considerations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Theory of the measurement of weak molecular complexes. I. General considerations.
About Theory of the measurement of weak molecular complexes. I. General considerations
This paper, published in 1969, received 299 indexed citations . Written by David A. Deranleau covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Spectroscopy (135 citations), Molecular Biology (123 citations) and Organic Chemistry (83 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja01043a004.