Proton magnetic resonance spectra of proteins in random-coil configurations

213 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1969, received 213 indexed citations. Written by C. C. McDonald and William D. Phillips covering the research area of Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Biophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (133 citations), Spectroscopy (71 citations) and Materials Chemistry (50 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Countries where authors are citing Proton magnetic resonance spectra of proteins in random-coil configurations

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Proton magnetic resonance spectra of proteins in random-coil configurations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Proton magnetic resonance spectra of proteins in random-coil configurations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Proton magnetic resonance spectra of proteins in random-coil configurations more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Proton magnetic resonance spectra of proteins in random-coil configurations

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Proton magnetic resonance spectra of proteins in random-coil configurations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Proton magnetic resonance spectra of proteins in random-coil configurations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja01034a039.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026