Chemical reactivity and the concept of charge- and frontier-controlled reactions
- Authors
- Gilles Klopman
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja01004a002 →Countries where authors are citing Chemical reactivity and the concept of charge- and frontier-controlled reactions
This map shows the geographic impact of Chemical reactivity and the concept of charge- and frontier-controlled reactions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chemical reactivity and the concept of charge- and frontier-controlled reactions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chemical reactivity and the concept of charge- and frontier-controlled reactions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Chemical reactivity and the concept of charge- and frontier-controlled reactions
This network shows the impact of Chemical reactivity and the concept of charge- and frontier-controlled reactions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Chemical reactivity and the concept of charge- and frontier-controlled reactions.
About Chemical reactivity and the concept of charge- and frontier-controlled reactions
This paper, published in 1968, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Gilles Klopman covering the research area of Electrochemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Catalysis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (697 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (248 citations) and Materials Chemistry (245 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja01004a002.