Gas-Liquid Chromatography of Trimethylsilyl Derivatives of Sugars and Related Substances

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 2.0k indexed citations. Written by Charles C. Sweeley, Ronald Bentley, M. Makita and William W. Wells covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (778 citations), Plant Science (408 citations) and Organic Chemistry (393 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Countries where authors are citing Gas-Liquid Chromatography of Trimethylsilyl Derivatives of Sugars and Related Substances

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gas-Liquid Chromatography of Trimethylsilyl Derivatives of Sugars and Related Substances. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gas-Liquid Chromatography of Trimethylsilyl Derivatives of Sugars and Related Substances with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gas-Liquid Chromatography of Trimethylsilyl Derivatives of Sugars and Related Substances more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Gas-Liquid Chromatography of Trimethylsilyl Derivatives of Sugars and Related Substances

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Gas-Liquid Chromatography of Trimethylsilyl Derivatives of Sugars and Related Substances. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Gas-Liquid Chromatography of Trimethylsilyl Derivatives of Sugars and Related Substances.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja00899a032.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026