Lower valent tungsten halides. New class of reagents for deoxygenation of organic molecules
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja00773a045 →Countries where authors are citing Lower valent tungsten halides. New class of reagents for deoxygenation of organic molecules
This map shows the geographic impact of Lower valent tungsten halides. New class of reagents for deoxygenation of organic molecules. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lower valent tungsten halides. New class of reagents for deoxygenation of organic molecules with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lower valent tungsten halides. New class of reagents for deoxygenation of organic molecules more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Lower valent tungsten halides. New class of reagents for deoxygenation of organic molecules
This network shows the impact of Lower valent tungsten halides. New class of reagents for deoxygenation of organic molecules. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Lower valent tungsten halides. New class of reagents for deoxygenation of organic molecules.
About Lower valent tungsten halides. New class of reagents for deoxygenation of organic molecules
This paper, published in 1972, received 145 indexed citations . Written by K. Barry Sharpless, Martha A. Umbreit and Thomas C. Flood covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Catalysis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (115 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (32 citations) and Molecular Biology (30 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja00773a045.