Perfluoro effect in photoelectron spectroscopy. I. Nonaromatic molecules
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja00760a007 →Countries where authors are citing Perfluoro effect in photoelectron spectroscopy. I. Nonaromatic molecules
This map shows the geographic impact of Perfluoro effect in photoelectron spectroscopy. I. Nonaromatic molecules. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Perfluoro effect in photoelectron spectroscopy. I. Nonaromatic molecules with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Perfluoro effect in photoelectron spectroscopy. I. Nonaromatic molecules more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Perfluoro effect in photoelectron spectroscopy. I. Nonaromatic molecules
This network shows the impact of Perfluoro effect in photoelectron spectroscopy. I. Nonaromatic molecules. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Perfluoro effect in photoelectron spectroscopy. I. Nonaromatic molecules.
About Perfluoro effect in photoelectron spectroscopy. I. Nonaromatic molecules
This paper, published in 1972, received 352 indexed citations . Written by C. R. Brundle, M. B. Robin, N. A. Kuebler and Harold Basch covering the research area of Inorganic Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Atmospheric Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (272 citations), Spectroscopy (114 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (102 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja00760a007.