Evaluation of strain in hydrocarbons. The strain in adamantane and its origin
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja00711a030 →Countries where authors are citing Evaluation of strain in hydrocarbons. The strain in adamantane and its origin
This map shows the geographic impact of Evaluation of strain in hydrocarbons. The strain in adamantane and its origin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evaluation of strain in hydrocarbons. The strain in adamantane and its origin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evaluation of strain in hydrocarbons. The strain in adamantane and its origin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Evaluation of strain in hydrocarbons. The strain in adamantane and its origin
This network shows the impact of Evaluation of strain in hydrocarbons. The strain in adamantane and its origin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Evaluation of strain in hydrocarbons. The strain in adamantane and its origin.
About Evaluation of strain in hydrocarbons. The strain in adamantane and its origin
This paper, published in 1970, received 533 indexed citations . Written by Paul von Ragué Schleyer, J. Earl Williams and Ken Blanchard covering the research area of Geophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (420 citations), Materials Chemistry (97 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (84 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja00711a030.