Selection of nonprotonated carbon resonances in solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance

642 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1979, received 642 indexed citations. Written by Stanley J. Opella and M. H. Frey covering the research area of Biophysics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Spectroscopy (457 citations), Materials Chemistry (267 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (234 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Countries where authors are citing Selection of nonprotonated carbon resonances in solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Selection of nonprotonated carbon resonances in solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Selection of nonprotonated carbon resonances in solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Selection of nonprotonated carbon resonances in solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Selection of nonprotonated carbon resonances in solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Selection of nonprotonated carbon resonances in solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Selection of nonprotonated carbon resonances in solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja00513a079.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026