Counterintuitive orbital mixing in semiempirical and ab initio molecular orbital calculations
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja00480a005 →Countries where authors are citing Counterintuitive orbital mixing in semiempirical and ab initio molecular orbital calculations
This map shows the geographic impact of Counterintuitive orbital mixing in semiempirical and ab initio molecular orbital calculations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Counterintuitive orbital mixing in semiempirical and ab initio molecular orbital calculations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Counterintuitive orbital mixing in semiempirical and ab initio molecular orbital calculations more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Counterintuitive orbital mixing in semiempirical and ab initio molecular orbital calculations
This network shows the impact of Counterintuitive orbital mixing in semiempirical and ab initio molecular orbital calculations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Counterintuitive orbital mixing in semiempirical and ab initio molecular orbital calculations.
About Counterintuitive orbital mixing in semiempirical and ab initio molecular orbital calculations
This paper, published in 1978, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by J. H. Ammeter, Hans Beat Buergi and Jack C. Thibeault covering the research area of Inorganic Chemistry, Filtration and Separation and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (445 citations), Organic Chemistry (368 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (355 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja00480a005.