Okadaic acid, a cytotoxic polyether from two marine sponges of the genus Halichondria
Countries where authors are citing Okadaic acid, a cytotoxic polyether from two marine sponges of the genus Halichondria
This map shows the geographic impact of Okadaic acid, a cytotoxic polyether from two marine sponges of the genus Halichondria. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Okadaic acid, a cytotoxic polyether from two marine sponges of the genus Halichondria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Okadaic acid, a cytotoxic polyether from two marine sponges of the genus Halichondria more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Okadaic acid, a cytotoxic polyether from two marine sponges of the genus Halichondria
This network shows the impact of Okadaic acid, a cytotoxic polyether from two marine sponges of the genus Halichondria. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Okadaic acid, a cytotoxic polyether from two marine sponges of the genus Halichondria.
About Okadaic acid, a cytotoxic polyether from two marine sponges of the genus Halichondria
This paper, published in 1981, received 617 indexed citations . Written by Kazuo Tachibana, Paul J. Scheuer, Yasumasa Tsukitani, Hiroyuki Kikuchi, Donna Van Engen, Jon Clardy, Y. Gopichand and Francis J. Schmitz covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Biotechnology and Ocean Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Environmental Chemistry (351 citations), Molecular Biology (266 citations) and Biotechnology (152 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja00399a082.