Sequence-Dependent Correction of Random Coil NMR Chemical Shifts
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja003760i →Countries where authors are citing Sequence-Dependent Correction of Random Coil NMR Chemical Shifts
This map shows the geographic impact of Sequence-Dependent Correction of Random Coil NMR Chemical Shifts. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sequence-Dependent Correction of Random Coil NMR Chemical Shifts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sequence-Dependent Correction of Random Coil NMR Chemical Shifts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Sequence-Dependent Correction of Random Coil NMR Chemical Shifts
This network shows the impact of Sequence-Dependent Correction of Random Coil NMR Chemical Shifts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Sequence-Dependent Correction of Random Coil NMR Chemical Shifts.
About Sequence-Dependent Correction of Random Coil NMR Chemical Shifts
This paper, published in 2001, received 507 indexed citations . Written by Stephan Schwarzinger, Gerard Kroon, Ted R. Foss, John Y. L. Chung, Peter E. Wright and H. Jane Dyson covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (439 citations), Materials Chemistry (180 citations) and Spectroscopy (117 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja003760i.