Description of conjugation and hyperconjugation in terms of electron distributions
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja00353a035 →Countries where authors are citing Description of conjugation and hyperconjugation in terms of electron distributions
This map shows the geographic impact of Description of conjugation and hyperconjugation in terms of electron distributions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Description of conjugation and hyperconjugation in terms of electron distributions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Description of conjugation and hyperconjugation in terms of electron distributions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Description of conjugation and hyperconjugation in terms of electron distributions
This network shows the impact of Description of conjugation and hyperconjugation in terms of electron distributions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Description of conjugation and hyperconjugation in terms of electron distributions.
About Description of conjugation and hyperconjugation in terms of electron distributions
This paper, published in 1983, received 552 indexed citations . Written by R. F. W. Bader, Tom Slee, Dieter Cremer and Elfi Kraka covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Surfaces, Coatings and Films and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (297 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (260 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (170 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja00353a035.