Evaluation of AM1 calculated proton affinities and deprotonation enthalpies

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 383 indexed citations. Written by Michael J. S. Dewar and Kenneth M. Dieter covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (198 citations), Spectroscopy (106 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (103 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Countries where authors are citing Evaluation of AM1 calculated proton affinities and deprotonation enthalpies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Evaluation of AM1 calculated proton affinities and deprotonation enthalpies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evaluation of AM1 calculated proton affinities and deprotonation enthalpies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evaluation of AM1 calculated proton affinities and deprotonation enthalpies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Evaluation of AM1 calculated proton affinities and deprotonation enthalpies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Evaluation of AM1 calculated proton affinities and deprotonation enthalpies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Evaluation of AM1 calculated proton affinities and deprotonation enthalpies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja00285a033.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026