Highly Enantioselective Rhodium-Catalyzed Hydrogenation with Monodentate Ligands
Countries where authors are citing Highly Enantioselective Rhodium-Catalyzed Hydrogenation with Monodentate Ligands
This map shows the geographic impact of Highly Enantioselective Rhodium-Catalyzed Hydrogenation with Monodentate Ligands. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Highly Enantioselective Rhodium-Catalyzed Hydrogenation with Monodentate Ligands with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Highly Enantioselective Rhodium-Catalyzed Hydrogenation with Monodentate Ligands more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Highly Enantioselective Rhodium-Catalyzed Hydrogenation with Monodentate Ligands
This network shows the impact of Highly Enantioselective Rhodium-Catalyzed Hydrogenation with Monodentate Ligands. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Highly Enantioselective Rhodium-Catalyzed Hydrogenation with Monodentate Ligands.
About Highly Enantioselective Rhodium-Catalyzed Hydrogenation with Monodentate Ligands
This paper, published in 2000, received 369 indexed citations . Written by Michel van den Berg, Adriaan J. Minnaard, Ebe P. Schudde, Jan H. van Esch, André H. M. de Vries, Johannes G. de Vries and Ben L. Feringa covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Inorganic Chemistry (322 citations), Organic Chemistry (250 citations) and Molecular Biology (167 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja002507f.