Separation of cross-relaxation and J cross-peaks in 2D rotating-frame NMR spectroscopy
Countries where authors are citing Separation of cross-relaxation and J cross-peaks in 2D rotating-frame NMR spectroscopy
This map shows the geographic impact of Separation of cross-relaxation and J cross-peaks in 2D rotating-frame NMR spectroscopy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Separation of cross-relaxation and J cross-peaks in 2D rotating-frame NMR spectroscopy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Separation of cross-relaxation and J cross-peaks in 2D rotating-frame NMR spectroscopy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Separation of cross-relaxation and J cross-peaks in 2D rotating-frame NMR spectroscopy
This network shows the impact of Separation of cross-relaxation and J cross-peaks in 2D rotating-frame NMR spectroscopy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Separation of cross-relaxation and J cross-peaks in 2D rotating-frame NMR spectroscopy.
About Separation of cross-relaxation and J cross-peaks in 2D rotating-frame NMR spectroscopy
This paper, published in 1987, received 289 indexed citations . Written by Horst Kessler, Christian Griesinger, Rainer Kerssebaum, Klaus Wagner and Richard R. Ernst covering the research area of Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (186 citations), Spectroscopy (97 citations) and Organic Chemistry (78 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja00236a063.