An ab Initio CFF93 All-Atom Force Field for Polycarbonates
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja00086a030 →Countries where authors are citing An ab Initio CFF93 All-Atom Force Field for Polycarbonates
This map shows the geographic impact of An ab Initio CFF93 All-Atom Force Field for Polycarbonates. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by An ab Initio CFF93 All-Atom Force Field for Polycarbonates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites An ab Initio CFF93 All-Atom Force Field for Polycarbonates more than expected).
Fields of papers citing An ab Initio CFF93 All-Atom Force Field for Polycarbonates
This network shows the impact of An ab Initio CFF93 All-Atom Force Field for Polycarbonates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the An ab Initio CFF93 All-Atom Force Field for Polycarbonates.
About An ab Initio CFF93 All-Atom Force Field for Polycarbonates
This paper, published in 1994, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Huai Sun, Stephen J. Mumby, Jon R. Maple and A. T. Hagler covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (475 citations), Polymers and Plastics (268 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (206 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja00086a030.