Supersonic metal cluster beams: laser photoionization studies of copper cluster (Cu2)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/j100211a002 →Countries where authors are citing Supersonic metal cluster beams: laser photoionization studies of copper cluster (Cu2)
This map shows the geographic impact of Supersonic metal cluster beams: laser photoionization studies of copper cluster (Cu2). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Supersonic metal cluster beams: laser photoionization studies of copper cluster (Cu2) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Supersonic metal cluster beams: laser photoionization studies of copper cluster (Cu2) more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Supersonic metal cluster beams: laser photoionization studies of copper cluster (Cu2)
This network shows the impact of Supersonic metal cluster beams: laser photoionization studies of copper cluster (Cu2). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Supersonic metal cluster beams: laser photoionization studies of copper cluster (Cu2).
About Supersonic metal cluster beams: laser photoionization studies of copper cluster (Cu2)
This paper, published in 1982, received 223 indexed citations . Written by David E. Powers, Steven G. Hansen, M. E. Geusic, J. B. Hopkins, T. G. Dietz, Michael A. Duncan, Patrick R. R. Langridge‐Smith and R. E. Smalley covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering and Atmospheric Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (151 citations), Materials Chemistry (71 citations) and Spectroscopy (66 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/j100211a002.