Comparison of Density Functional and MP2 Calculations on the Water Monomer and Dimer
- Authors
- Kenneth D. Jordan
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/j100091a024 →Countries where authors are citing Comparison of Density Functional and MP2 Calculations on the Water Monomer and Dimer
This map shows the geographic impact of Comparison of Density Functional and MP2 Calculations on the Water Monomer and Dimer. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Comparison of Density Functional and MP2 Calculations on the Water Monomer and Dimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparison of Density Functional and MP2 Calculations on the Water Monomer and Dimer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Comparison of Density Functional and MP2 Calculations on the Water Monomer and Dimer
This network shows the impact of Comparison of Density Functional and MP2 Calculations on the Water Monomer and Dimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Comparison of Density Functional and MP2 Calculations on the Water Monomer and Dimer.
About Comparison of Density Functional and MP2 Calculations on the Water Monomer and Dimer
This paper, published in 1994, received 869 indexed citations . Written by Kenneth D. Jordan covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (273 citations), Materials Chemistry (272 citations) and Organic Chemistry (226 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/j100091a024.