A Priori Phase Equilibrium Prediction from a Segment Contribution Solvation Model
- Authors
- Shiang‐Tai LinStanley I. Sandler
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ie001047w →Countries where authors are citing A Priori Phase Equilibrium Prediction from a Segment Contribution Solvation Model
This map shows the geographic impact of A Priori Phase Equilibrium Prediction from a Segment Contribution Solvation Model. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Priori Phase Equilibrium Prediction from a Segment Contribution Solvation Model with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Priori Phase Equilibrium Prediction from a Segment Contribution Solvation Model more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Priori Phase Equilibrium Prediction from a Segment Contribution Solvation Model
This network shows the impact of A Priori Phase Equilibrium Prediction from a Segment Contribution Solvation Model. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Priori Phase Equilibrium Prediction from a Segment Contribution Solvation Model.
About A Priori Phase Equilibrium Prediction from a Segment Contribution Solvation Model
This paper, published in 2001, received 742 indexed citations . Written by Shiang‐Tai Lin and Stanley I. Sandler covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (399 citations), Catalysis (265 citations) and Filtration and Separation (188 citations). Published in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ie001047w.