Electroreduction of Dioxygen for Fuel-Cell Applications: Materials and Challenges

623 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2010, received 623 indexed citations. Written by Andrew A. Gewirth and Matthew S. Thorum covering the research area of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (543 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (479 citations) and Materials Chemistry (133 citations). Published in Inorganic Chemistry.

Countries where authors are citing Electroreduction of Dioxygen for Fuel-Cell Applications: Materials and Challenges

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Electroreduction of Dioxygen for Fuel-Cell Applications: Materials and Challenges. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Electroreduction of Dioxygen for Fuel-Cell Applications: Materials and Challenges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Electroreduction of Dioxygen for Fuel-Cell Applications: Materials and Challenges more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Electroreduction of Dioxygen for Fuel-Cell Applications: Materials and Challenges

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Electroreduction of Dioxygen for Fuel-Cell Applications: Materials and Challenges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Electroreduction of Dioxygen for Fuel-Cell Applications: Materials and Challenges.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ic9022486.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026