Evaluation of Homogeneous Electrocatalysts by Cyclic Voltammetry
- Journal
- Inorganic Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ic500658x →Countries where authors are citing Evaluation of Homogeneous Electrocatalysts by Cyclic Voltammetry
This map shows the geographic impact of Evaluation of Homogeneous Electrocatalysts by Cyclic Voltammetry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evaluation of Homogeneous Electrocatalysts by Cyclic Voltammetry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evaluation of Homogeneous Electrocatalysts by Cyclic Voltammetry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Evaluation of Homogeneous Electrocatalysts by Cyclic Voltammetry
This network shows the impact of Evaluation of Homogeneous Electrocatalysts by Cyclic Voltammetry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Evaluation of Homogeneous Electrocatalysts by Cyclic Voltammetry.
About Evaluation of Homogeneous Electrocatalysts by Cyclic Voltammetry
This paper, published in 2014, received 472 indexed citations . Written by Eric S. Rountree, Brian D. McCarthy, Thomas T. Eisenhart and Jillian L. Dempsey covering the research area of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (392 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (175 citations) and Electrochemistry (98 citations). Published in Inorganic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ic500658x.