Estimates of Upper Bounds and Trends in Nano-TiO2 Production As a Basis for Exposure Assessment
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/es8032549 →Countries where authors are citing Estimates of Upper Bounds and Trends in Nano-TiO2 Production As a Basis for Exposure Assessment
This map shows the geographic impact of Estimates of Upper Bounds and Trends in Nano-TiO2 Production As a Basis for Exposure Assessment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Estimates of Upper Bounds and Trends in Nano-TiO2 Production As a Basis for Exposure Assessment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Estimates of Upper Bounds and Trends in Nano-TiO2 Production As a Basis for Exposure Assessment more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Estimates of Upper Bounds and Trends in Nano-TiO2 Production As a Basis for Exposure Assessment
This network shows the impact of Estimates of Upper Bounds and Trends in Nano-TiO2 Production As a Basis for Exposure Assessment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Estimates of Upper Bounds and Trends in Nano-TiO2 Production As a Basis for Exposure Assessment.
About Estimates of Upper Bounds and Trends in Nano-TiO2 Production As a Basis for Exposure Assessment
This paper, published in 2009, received 496 indexed citations . Written by Michael R. Darby, Lynne G. Zucker and Mark R. Wiesner covering the research area of Mechanical Engineering and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (381 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (126 citations) and Pollution (114 citations). Published in Environmental Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/es8032549.