Mercury Methylation by Novel Microorganisms from New Environments
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/es403075t →Countries where authors are citing Mercury Methylation by Novel Microorganisms from New Environments
This map shows the geographic impact of Mercury Methylation by Novel Microorganisms from New Environments. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mercury Methylation by Novel Microorganisms from New Environments with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mercury Methylation by Novel Microorganisms from New Environments more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Mercury Methylation by Novel Microorganisms from New Environments
This network shows the impact of Mercury Methylation by Novel Microorganisms from New Environments. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mercury Methylation by Novel Microorganisms from New Environments.
About Mercury Methylation by Novel Microorganisms from New Environments
This paper, published in 2013, received 588 indexed citations . Written by Cynthia C. Gilmour, Mircea Podar, Andrew M. Graham, Steven D. Brown, Anil Somenahally, Alexander Johs, Richard A. Hurt, Kathryn L. Bailey and Dwayne A. Elias covering the research area of Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (559 citations), Ecology (190 citations) and Pollution (184 citations). Published in Environmental Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/es403075t.