Water Use for Shale-Gas Production in Texas, U.S.
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/es204602t →Countries where authors are citing Water Use for Shale-Gas Production in Texas, U.S.
This map shows the geographic impact of Water Use for Shale-Gas Production in Texas, U.S.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Water Use for Shale-Gas Production in Texas, U.S. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Water Use for Shale-Gas Production in Texas, U.S. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Water Use for Shale-Gas Production in Texas, U.S.
This network shows the impact of Water Use for Shale-Gas Production in Texas, U.S.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Water Use for Shale-Gas Production in Texas, U.S..
About Water Use for Shale-Gas Production in Texas, U.S.
This paper, published in 2012, received 399 indexed citations . Written by Jean‐Philippe Nicot and Bridget R. Scanlon covering the research area of Water Science and Technology, Mechanical Engineering and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (274 citations), Mechanical Engineering (153 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (148 citations). Published in Environmental Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/es204602t.