Oil Biodegradation and Bioremediation: A Tale of the Two Worst Spills in U.S. History
- Authors
- Robert AtlasTerry C. Hazen
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/es2013227 →Countries where authors are citing Oil Biodegradation and Bioremediation: A Tale of the Two Worst Spills in U.S. History
This map shows the geographic impact of Oil Biodegradation and Bioremediation: A Tale of the Two Worst Spills in U.S. History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oil Biodegradation and Bioremediation: A Tale of the Two Worst Spills in U.S. History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oil Biodegradation and Bioremediation: A Tale of the Two Worst Spills in U.S. History more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Oil Biodegradation and Bioremediation: A Tale of the Two Worst Spills in U.S. History
This network shows the impact of Oil Biodegradation and Bioremediation: A Tale of the Two Worst Spills in U.S. History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Oil Biodegradation and Bioremediation: A Tale of the Two Worst Spills in U.S. History.
About Oil Biodegradation and Bioremediation: A Tale of the Two Worst Spills in U.S. History
This paper, published in 2011, received 634 indexed citations . Written by Robert Atlas and Terry C. Hazen covering the research area of Pollution and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pollution (450 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (165 citations) and Ecology (153 citations). Published in Environmental Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/es2013227.